Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope book. Happy reading Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Pocket Guide.
Best *Liberal Views* images in | Politics, Words, Politicians

For Stephanie Mills it was the nuclear bomb that made her realize that humanity's survival was now in its own hands. For many of these activists who grew up in the fifties with the idea that progress was everything and the idea that more material goods meant more happiness, their environmentalism grew out of disillusionment with the ideology of the time. Incredibly, despite the fact that it is now 30 years later, and the world is a very different place, many of their thoughts could apply to the ideology of today, and much of their disillusionment is the same disillusionment being felt by our generation.

More after the jump Are you a filmmaker looking to share your work with a progressive audience? Looking for ways to promote your film among the liberal grassroots community? If so, Screening Liberally and Netroots Nation want to see your stuff! The deadline has been extended to Tuesday, April 6th! Time is running out; submit your film for Netroots Nation You know that feeling you get when you walk into a Starbucks that makes you cringe? Yes folks, it's time for the biggest political event of the season More controversial than the presidential elections, a damn sight sexier than the Democratic National Convention, wackier than the Conservative Political Action Conference, and more talked about than the National Tea Party Convention It's the 82nd Annual Academy Awards!!!

So turn those TVs up and put those thinking caps on for this year's ….

Kagan Nomination Leaves Longing on the Left

They're a good deal worse. They don't even know the rules. I think of it as a great opportunity to comment on the world in which we live. There will always be issues I care about. I was given the role of "Sparky," the gay dog.

  • Work, pray, fear: my life in the Family cult.
  • The Castles of the Rhine: Recreating the Middle Ages in Modern Germany?
  • The Ornamental Arts of Japan (Dover Fine Art, History of Art).

Who am I? I share people's grievances about the current Administration …. My job is to try and find ways of talking about issues that move us forward. I don't make policy, but I can shine a light on faulty or good policy.

  • The Glass Butterfly?
  • Blindman’s Buff: An Agatha Christie Short Story!
  • Loading...!
  • Practicing Spanish based on Crosswords - Advanced Level?

The media are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the right wing. Aren't ancient redwoods more precious than gold? Sullivan brings to the screen a palpable, often endearing portrait of a man, of a campaign resisting the seemingly indomitable momentum of incumbency.

The film is a tireless, close piece of cinema, but also offers a window into the state of the current progressive movement, one which is bound to leave audiences as the one Wednesday inspired to organize, act, and work for real change. City Council candidates Yetta Kurland and Pete Gleason were also on-hand to provide insights about challenging the daunting inertia of incumbency. These are people who understand election fraud occurs long before faulty voting machines and roll purges.

The real charade is perpetrated by not having legitimate alternatives to the static machinations in Albany, Washington, and beyond. There's a reason social conservatives used to overwhelmingly support the Democrats: they believed in a strong welfare state to support the public good, for example, based on ideas of Christian charity. Economic or fiscal conservatism is also very significant politically. Fiscal conservatives support low taxation trickle-down in particular and free market capitalism with minimal regulation.

Don't Miss

This benefits the economic interests of big industries , entrepreneurs or the ruling class in some countries , at the expense of everyone else. In Europe , many economic conservatives are not necessarily socially conservative, often being non-religious and unconcerned by issues such as same-sex marriage. In America, however, the two forms of conservatism are heavily intertwined, especially within the Republican Party and its supporters. This bundling of the two major types of conservatism with each other is extreme to the extent that many conservatives cannot recognise the distinction - and see both concepts as central to "conservative values," leading to the idea that you can be all in favour of abolishing tax, deregulating the market and abolishing trade unions all you like, but if you make a single pro-choice statement, you're labelled as a RINO liberal.

You can't have a discussion about modern day conservatism, especially economic conservatism, without talking about supply side economics. Supply-side economics is widely criticized by neo- Keynesian economists, who are in turn voraciously criticized by libertarians. Four researchers surveyed research literature about the psychology of conservatism.

No shit. The chief psychological factors of conservatism:. It is debatable whether these factors are associated chiefly with conservatism. One admitted shortfall in this study was that "little or no empirical data are available from the major communist or formerly communist countries" on this subject, [15] which made a study of communist psychology in general very difficult.

However, the researchers acknowledge that these factors were also exhibited by many communist dictators, such as Joseph Stalin and Fidel Castro. They respond by claiming that these men, because they resisted change while in power, "may be considered politically conservative, at least in the context of the systems they defended.

Navigation menu

In fairness to conservatives, some studies of political extremist groups have suggested that the far-left has very similar traits to the far-right in terms of their tactics and preference for authoritarianism. What is conservatism and what is wrong with it? The term rightism is rarely used, but tends to refer to a form of extreme conservatism that seeks to do away with democratic politics entirely.

In the past, most "rightist" groups either sought a restoration of a previous monarchy , or the creation of a fascist or authoritarian regime to "undo the chaos of democracy. Another common component of rightism, however, has not waned: extreme nationalism. Most rightist groups try to force out all immigrants and minorities. It is possible that in modern rightism this form of nationalism is the only defining characteristic.

Officially those on the far right embrace the concept of the "inequality of outcome", meaning that one group is naturally better than another. This can apply to everything from absolute monarchies to Nazism , meaning that many far-rightists oppose others on the far right who have a different idea of what the ruling class should be. Much like the term "far left", if you hear the term "far right" it's almost certain to be a slur directed at a conservative. The label of "far right" came about in the context of the French Revolution : those who sat on the right wing of the National Assembly [20] in June and July favored an essentially unrestrained aristocracy in terms of the power allocated to them, essentially wanting to either maintain or later restore the old order.

They also tended to be opposed to the Enlightenment and secularism in favor of more conservative religious influence in government. To what degree there is much of a difference between them in practice is up for debate and usually changes from country to country. In the 21st century the far right in the Western world has increasingly drifted towards broadly authoritarian nativist thought, often influenced by former fascist movements. Centrism is a set of political positions that lie between the "left" and "right" wings of the political spectrum.

The term is usually applied to a global spectrum of political philosophies and ideologies, not to those of single nations , as their political centers tend to differ strongly based on history , culture and the state of development. As a result, a party that might be centrist in a global sense such as the American Democratic Party , might be seen as "left" in its own national context.

In established democracies , it is usually highly beneficial and intellectually reasonable for a party to occupy most of the territory in the middle of the spectrum, especially in majoritarian electoral systems, as this is where the coveted swing votes are to be found. Hence, parties often strive to occupy a center-left or center-right position, or at least try to brand themselves as such.

While pure "centrist" parties have a mixed record of electoral success, advancing centrist policies to some extent is a popular strategy among parties in modern developed nations. For example, both dominant parties in Germany are so moderate as to be nearly identical. Chancellor Angela Merkel has taken such advantage of the centrist discourse that she's manipulated the political structure to benefit her most of all; discussion is less about who replaces Merkel and more about who becomes her top lieutenant or successor. During polarizing time periods, centrists tend to be attacked by both sides.

When politics was split between collectivist, statist socialism and paternalistic "family values" conservatism, centrism often manifested as an individualistic liberalism which combined belief in capitalism "economic freedom" with support for human rights and greater personal freedom: the Liberal Party in the UK predecessor of the Lib Dems often took this route, e.

This often manifests as technocracy or "evidence-based policymaking", and can take the form of a centralised, targets-fixated, and slightly authoritarian but hopefully benevolent managerial state, as under Tony Blair. Almost all of the Pirate Parties are centrist parties with special interest in civil rights and copyright reform. However, there are a bunch of exceptions, as the Austrian, [25] Australian [26] and Italian [27] Pirate Parties tend to be on a firmly leftist economic stance, while some Pirate Parties of northern Europe have shown some libertarian leanings.

Most European Green parties are leftist, but some centrists such as the British Liberal Democrats take a firmly pro-environmental stance. This may connect with their desire to be seen as the "nice party". Also known as "fascists", "libtards", "snowflakes", and "shills", depending on who you ask, those who see themselves as being in the center of the political spectrum are, for the most part, criticized by both harder ends of the spectrum. While they do exist, in recent years, the term "political moderate " a. A prominent moderate movement that grew in the United States were that of the New Democrats in the early 's, after Bill Clinton , who had some views akin to traditional Rockefeller Republicanism , attracted many of Ronald Reagan 's more moderate voters, which encompassed quite a bit of the slowly radicalizing GOP establishment throughout the 's, a process contributed to by various factors from decades earlier, such as the Civil Rights Movement, the Watergate Scandal, and the Vietnam War.

Many of these centrists became swing voters in various elections, such as the presidential election , which pretty much sealed the fate of the Republican Party. Now, most actual moderates, some even relatively conservative, align with the Democratic Party , and fewer with the Republicans, in some cases. Those centrists who do not are pretty much on their own. The term "moderate" is generally used by both the left and the right to refer to those individuals who express a certain amount of skepticism towards the views of both wings, preferring instead to think analytically, making centrists the most marginalized political affiliation in the modern climate.

As an insult, it instead usually refers to those who have some conservative views and some liberal views — e. Others are actually closet extremists pretending to be moderate so they can get elected. One could argue that, in fact, there is no such thing as a moderate, those being considered such really just being individuals who pick and choose individual policies on an ideological level rather than subscribe to any one particular side. One reason moderate politicians aren't often trusted is that you never know which side of an issue they actually favor until the last moment.

A good example is Joe Lieberman , who was in favor of extending Medicare to people aged until it seemed that it would actually pass. Political centrism seems to be rather rare these days, despite moderate wings existing in both parties to some degree. One of the most common criticisms isn't necessarily at centrism but instead towards those that centrism sometimes tends to attract, mainly opportunist politicians with no core values who see centrism as giving them the best chance of getting elected. One example of this was the Simpson-Bowles plan, a budget plan that was championed by centrists simply because it was seen as a "compromise" between the two parties , even though some of the measures in the plan could have arguably worsened the downturn.

Political radicals and extremists tend to criticize centrists for being "sell-outs" to the enemy group that secretly controls everything , or claim that centrists are tricksters bent on oppressing the public. Rarely will these radicals actually recognize centrists, instead preferring to characterize them as the " real radicals. Another common critique of centrism is that centrists will commonly invoke the balance fallacy , commonly acting as if "both sides are just as bad" just so they can hold onto their centrist credentials.

This is especially common with Very Serious People. Alternately, many centrists become Very Serious People, who talk about serious issues very seriously, yet fail to offer real solutions other than the status quo. Finally, many centrists tend to disregard ideologies such as socialism and libertarianism completely, ignoring the truth value of individual claims in such philosophies.

Extremism is a catch-all term for those whose political or religious views are far from the center of a given political spectrum, with connotations of being dangerously so. It is often synonymous with wingnut. It also refers to both wingnuts and moonbats simultaneously, given that "wingnut" is sometimes specific to the far right and "moonbat" specific to the far left.

More specifically, it has been used to refer to those wingnuts and moonbats who have an "end justifies the means" mentality and are willing to use violence or other extralegal means to achieve their goals. However, it is sometimes also used to imply that said wingnuts and moonbats are criminal elements willing to use violence even when in some cases they are not.

Wingnuts and moonbats usually don't like being called extremists, although they'll happily call each other extremists. Then again, they usually don't like being called wingnuts and moonbats either. One of the early and still insightful treatments of the subject is Eric Hoffer 's book "The True Believer. Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. Jump to: navigation , search. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain. Out of this there emerged a political project which I would call neoliberalism.

And they never take the form of convictions. It is also well-known that as people get older, they become more rightwing. It is also a fact that, as people get older, their brain cells die at a faster and faster rate. I would therefore like to propose that conservatism be classified as a degenerative disease. Republicans used to have a basic faith in the dynamism and openness of the free market. Now the party fears openness and competition My Wishlist Sign In Join.

Michael Tillotson. Rainer Forst Jeffrey Flynn. Mahatma Gandhi Nonviolent Power in Action. Ecological Economics from the Ground Up.

Intelligence and U. Robert Muchembled. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences The state of the art. David Byrne Gillian Callaghan. Mark S.

Best Happy To Be A Lefty Liberal images in | Political memes, Frases, American freedom

Reed Lindsay C. The Restructuring of Capitalism in Our Time. Music and Soviet Power, Marina Frolova-Walker Jonathan Walker. The Creative Industries Culture and Policy. Linda Miller Professor Denise Hevey. Trade Policy Disaster Lessons from the s. Ugo Rossi Alberto Vanolo. Media and Terrorism Global Perspectives. Julius Caesar The Colossus of Rome. Richard A. Reason and Revelation before Historicism Strauss and Fackenheim. Sharon Jo Portnoff.

Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope
Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope
Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope
Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope
Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope
Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope
Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope

Related Quoting Liberally: Why Lefties are Americas Best Hope

Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved